How does the table’s design accommodate the use of ER=EPR meeting protocols?

The ER=EPR conjecture, a profound idea in theoretical physics, proposes a link between quantum entanglement (EPR) and spacetime geometry (Einstein-Rosen bridges, or ER). Holding a meeting to discuss such a protocol demands a table design that accommodates both its profound conceptual nature and the practical needs of collaborative discourse.

Physically, the table must facilitate seamless, multi-directional interaction. A circular or oval shape is ideal, eliminating hierarchical "head" positions and symbolizing the non-local, interconnected nature of entanglement itself. The surface should be large enough to spread out diagrams of wormholes, Penrose diagrams, and complex equations, suggesting a workspace that maps geometry directly onto its plane. Integrated power and data ports at regular intervals are essential for running simulations and accessing research, mirroring the "connectivity" of the ER bridge.

Conceptually, the design embodies the protocol's principles. A central, translucent inlay could evoke a holographic display or a symbolic "bridge," representing the ER=EPR connection as the heart of the discussion. The use of materials—perhaps combining cool, smooth metal (representing quantum precision) with warm, grained wood (representing spacetime fabric)—creates a tactile metaphor. The table's very stability grounds a conversation about the fabric of reality, while its design encourages a flow of ideas as non-linear as the topology it discusses.

Ultimately, this is not merely furniture. It is a functional metaphor, a topological object in its own right that physically instantiates the meeting's purpose: to turn abstract quantum connections into tangible, shared understanding across its surface. The table doesn't just hold papers and laptops; it accommodates the geometry of the idea itself.