What are the key ergonomic studies or research that informed the design of the Landscape Round Table?

The design of the Landscape Round Table is deeply rooted in a synthesis of pivotal ergonomic and human-centered research. Key studies informing its form and function originate from three primary domains. First, anthropometric and postural dynamics research, particularly the work of Grandjean and Hinting on seated spinal alignment and pressure distribution, guided the table's height, curvature, and legroom to promote a neutral spine and reduce musculoskeletal strain. This is complemented by principles of "active sitting" and dynamic posture, which advocate for micro-movements, leading to the table's subtle, organic contours that encourage natural shifts in position rather than static, rigid postures.

Second, the concept is heavily influenced by environmental psychology and biophilic design studies, notably the "Attention Restoration Theory" proposed by Kaplan and Kaplan. Research on non-rectilinear forms and natural analogues demonstrates their capacity to reduce cognitive fatigue. The table's flowing, landscape-inspired shape is a direct application of this, aiming to create a visually restorative focal point that subconsciously lowers stress levels in collaborative or focused work settings.

Finally, studies on collaborative workspace dynamics, such as those by Brill and Weidemann on interaction zones and sightlines, informed the round, non-hierarchical form. A circular topology eliminates positional "power ends," fosters equitable participation, and optimizes eye contact and acoustic clarity within small groups. Thus, the Landscape Round Table is not merely a surface but an intervention built upon converging evidence from physical ergonomics, cognitive psychology, and social dynamics, aiming to holistically support the human body, mind, and social interaction.