What are the most common concerns raised by IT teams about integrating the table with existing infrastructure?

When IT teams face the challenge of integrating new database tables into existing infrastructure, several common concerns consistently emerge. The primary apprehension revolves around data migration complexity, where teams worry about transferring vast amounts of information without corruption or loss. System compatibility stands as another significant hurdle, as legacy systems often struggle to communicate effectively with modern database structures. Performance impact represents a critical consideration, with teams questioning how the new integration might affect overall system speed and responsiveness. Security vulnerabilities naturally surface as a top priority, particularly regarding how new data pathways might create potential breach points. Implementation costs and resource allocation frequently dominate discussions, as IT leaders must justify the financial and human investment required. Additionally, teams express concerns about scalability limitations, questioning whether the integrated solution can accommodate future growth. Maintenance overhead introduces another layer of complexity, as ongoing support requirements must align with existing operational capacities. Data integrity preservation during and after integration remains paramount, with teams implementing rigorous validation protocols. Finally, interoperability with third-party applications and existing business intelligence tools completes the list of predominant IT concerns, ensuring the new table integration enhances rather than hinders the technological ecosystem.