How does polyethylene’s resistance to rodent damage compare to wood alternatives?

When comparing polyethylene and wood in terms of resistance to rodent damage, polyethylene emerges as the clear winner. Unlike wood, which is naturally attractive to rodents due to its organic composition and chewable texture, polyethylene is a synthetic material that lacks nutritional value and is far less appealing to pests.

Rodents, such as rats and mice, often gnaw on wood to maintain their teeth or build nests, leading to structural damage over time. Polyethylene, however, is highly resistant to such behavior. Its dense, non-porous surface discourages chewing, and its chemical composition does not break down as easily as organic materials like wood.

Additionally, polyethylene does not rot or decay, further reducing its vulnerability to pests. Wood, on the other hand, can absorb moisture and attract insects, creating an environment that rodents find inviting. For applications requiring long-term durability and minimal maintenance—such as outdoor furniture, decking, or storage solutions—polyethylene offers a reliable, rodent-proof alternative to traditional wood.

In summary, polyethylene's synthetic nature and structural integrity make it a superior choice for resisting rodent damage compared to wood, ensuring longevity and reduced repair costs.